Your model compiles. Can you ship it?
We follow Part 6 from architectural design to integration. You get a clear workflow, the right work products, and evidence that walks any audit.
Walk the V → See the ToolchainThe model and the generated code can disagree. Without back-to-back testing, you have two sources, not one.
Catching bugs at integration takes ten times longer than catching them at the model. Slow tests at the model mean slow shipping.
A model with no enforced guidelines and no coverage targets is just a different way of writing buggy code.
Combining Simulink, Stateflow and ISO 26262 well is a skill — and our four professional courses give engineers a shared vocabulary for safe model-based development.
Scripts, data types, automation, debugging — the workbench under every Simulink project.
Course 02Continuous, discrete, algebraic and logical systems — modelled for production.
Course 03Flow charts, state machines, hierarchical logic — and how to keep them maintainable.
Course 04The processes, guidelines and verification methods that turn a model into a safety case.
Read the standard left to right. Every clause is a stage. Every stage has a tool.
Figure 1The ISO 26262-6 V-model, with EverCheck, EverTest and EverView mapped onto each clause.
Each stage has clear inputs, clear outputs, and the right tools for the job.
Clause 7 wants an architecture that is verifiable, configurable and testable. In an MBD project, that architecture is a Simulink and Stateflow model.
EverCheck makes sure it's a model a reviewer can trust. Every signal has a name, a type, a range, a unit. The hardware-software interface is fully defined.
Every requirement ID is annotated in a format the tool can check automatically. No traceability spreadsheets, no review-by-eye.
Clause 8 lists ten design principles for software units. Most of them are about model hygiene: one entry/exit, no dynamic objects, no implicit type conversions.
EverCheck enforces them. MAAB and MISRA SLSF rule sets out of the box, project-specific extensions on top. The Run & Fix feature corrects the violations that have a known fix and flags the rest before the developer compiles.
The result: a well-defined subset of Simulink and Stateflow that simplifies every later step — code generation, structural coverage, formal inspection.
Clause 9 sets one bar: every requirement exercised, every branch covered. EverTest is built around that bar.
Test cases are organised by requirement ID. The HTML verification report combines test results, traceability, statement, branch and MCDC coverage. The same test runs unchanged across MIL, SIL and PIL — the algorithm proven in simulation is proven again on the target.
EverTest also brings Test-Driven Development into reach. Engineers write the failing test, build the feature, watch it pass. The Clause 9 evidence becomes a side-effect of the design loop.
Figure 2The TDD inner loop — tests first, model second.
Clause 10 asks the harder question: do the verified units behave correctly when wired together, on the target, against the architectural design?
EverTest treats subsystems as atomic. It generates harnesses, warns when boundaries are missing, and supports fault injection to exercise the architectural safety mechanisms.
For the back-to-back test, the same EverTest cases run on model, SIL and PIL. Numerical equivalence becomes a report, not a manual exercise.
EverView turns any Simulink or Stateflow model into a single self-contained HTML file. One click in version control, one second to open.
No licence. No setup. Anyone with access opens the file in a browser.
Reviewers navigate, inspect functionality, search for text patterns and add comments. Each set of comments saves to its own file; EverView merges them back. The author keeps authorship. The reviewer keeps independence. The audit trail keeps both.
Figure 3The verification review workflow.
A clean workflow is not enough on its own. ISO 26262-8 Clause 11 requires you to demonstrate that the tools you used to produce the safety case are themselves trustworthy.
Both EverCheck and EverTest are TCL 3 qualified. Each ships with a Safety Manual, a Qualification Kit and a validation test suite that you run in your own environment.
How Tool Qualification Works →Over a decade of hands-on experience in ISO 26262 model-based development.
Tell us about your project. We will find the right starting point.
Book a Call → Download Free TrialOr write to us at support@everbits.com